Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ALI versus THE STATE

Rule 9 of the Drugs Act 1997 Section 9 incidents took the normal route as the suspect's bag was searched and arrested after the heroin was recovered from the bag and detained and imprisoned. Steps were taken. Writing a report for inclusion in the FIR did not mean investigating the matter by itself, but rather investigating the matter through a sub-inspector who was authorized in that regard. The person carrying the articles to the laboratory did not have to be presented. Unless the witness shows that the seal or parcel was tampered with or replaced, the prosecution's case is merely doubtful as to the authenticity of the report as it is delayed in sending the matter to the laboratory. Wind. Regarding the territorial jurisdiction or boundaries of the laboratory, the question was, to what extent is the laboratory in Punjab or in the NWFP or any other P? Roons had examined, if otherwise authorized, the magistrate expressly dismissed in court that he had removed the prohibited articles in compliance with the court's order, and that his report contained no Was also not open to objections of sorts. The prosecution's evidence, which could be termed as unwarrantable, was not enough to warrant the prosecution's case. The two material witnesses were neither interested in the success of the prosecution nor did they have any enmity with the accused. And their testimony cannot be doubted. Non-production of bags from the court from which heroin was recovered, although in the case of the prosecution when you need a advocate from Pindi gheb lawyer