Find a Lawyer

NIAZ AKBAR versus PAKISTAN ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION THROUGH CHAIRMAN

Pakistan Atomic Energy Commission Employees (Services) Regulations 1974 Regln 3 2 Pakistan Atomic Energy Commission Ordinance (X65I 1965), Section 13, 20 and 21 General Financial Rules, RR 116 and 117 Government Employees (Appointment, Promotion and Exchange) Rules, 1973, R12A [Special Relief Act (I of 1877)), Section 42 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 1212 (3) Declaration of Birth Suit for Pakistan Atomic Based on a civil court order issued by an Energy Commission employee, the employee obtained a modified metric certificate and national identification card, which was approved in such case, and then its date of birth Ash 13 6 applied to the Commission to change from 1964 to 11 3 1967. , Which made necessary amendments to its Service Record Commission to reconsider the matter, withdrew the appeal of the department, as well as the appeal of the case, and before the dismissal of the service tribunal. The appeal was also dismissed because the Commission had fixed his date of birth on his request, thus, he had a valuable right to assemble and the principle of Lux punctuality was not available at this place. It was filed by Valdetti Employee after a 13-year period of issuance of the K Matric Certificate. A declaration, which he obtained without enforcing the commission as a party, in which he had hired on the basis of such a document, would be given the date of birth of the consecration which the decree issued by him. Was given 13 years ago. At the time of his appointment to the Commission in this regard, only the clerk in the birth certificate was wrong, according to R 116 of the General Financial Rules of the Central Government. top advocate from Baroute lawyer