Find a Lawyer

PAKISTAN INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES CORPORATIONTHROUGH CHAIRMAN -- APPELLANT versus CAPTAIN M.S.K. LODHI

Service Tribunals Act 1973 Section 4 Martial Law Regulation 52 (CMLA), 1981 Office of Federal Content (Ombudsman) Order (1 of 1983), Arts 9 and 32 Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Sections 5 and 14 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 1212 (3) An employee serving as a Cadet Pilot in Pakistan International Airlines was removed from the job on March 11, 1981 under the Martial 198 Law Regulation 52 National Industrial Relations Commission. The board had directed the letter to be restored to the service corporation. 13 12 In 1990, employees were given the option of receiving an active compensation in lieu of reimbursement, but submitted a job report on 1 2 1990, under the agreement notifying the corporation that employees issued another airline on 2 2 1990. Joined the line that they will report the assignment. Then his duty at the corporation gave the employee so much respite and demanded that he pay 25% of his basic salary after the expiry of his term of compensation in lieu. He restored his service under the MLR 52 from the date of his dismissal until 31st, 1990, which rejected his claim on 29 6 1994 and his appeal to the President of Pakistan 18000. In 2000, an appeal was filed before the service tribunal against the dismissal order. Federal Content, which was accepted, had no jurisdiction over Federal Content, in order to resolve a complaint from the Service Tribunal before being banned for error in reaching the wrong forum. There will be no good reason to apologize for the delay. The letter, dated 13 12 1990, but he offered a job again inheritance advocates near Bannu lawyer