Find a Lawyer

FAZAL AHMED ALIAS FAZLA versus THE STATE

Pakistan Penal Code Section 302 (b) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) The defense evidence was thought to be untrustworthy and witnesses who urged the importance of trust consistently said that the accused The size of the wounds, which were fired at reasonable distance from the victim when the carbine was fitted, shows that the bullet did not come from the bullet, but the bullet from the suspect during the investigation will not change the fate of the prosecution case. Because it appears that dishonest investigation to pay the investigating officer damages for the prosecution case The artificial contradiction created by the lawsuit was extremely deadly for the prosecution and the medical evidence was not contradictory to the ocular account There was absolutely no reason for the eyewitness to falsely implicate the accused. His presence was not seriously challenged by Def at the scene of the incident. The Ocular testimony was convincing and credible, with encouragement and appropriate support from the medical evidence, a theory formulated by both courts. But no exception can be taken under which the Supreme Court did not refuse to appeal. online advocate from Sehar Baqlas lawyer