SYED SHAMHORISH RIZWAN AL MURTAZA versus SYED ZAHEER UL HUSNAIN
Section 265 K & 417 Panel Code of Criminal Procedure (CR PC) (XLV of 1860), Section 392/34/148/149 Crimes Against Property (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VI of 1979), Section 17 Constitution of Pakistan ( 1973), Article 03G against the defendants on appeal against the charges of retribution by the complainant included a crime under the HUDO rules and the accused was summoned by the trial court to stand trial on the basis of the same allegations and Was charged. The High Court's appeal against the accused, who also included a chief under the Hodgood rules, was not upheld, because it should have been filed before the Federal Shariat Court that it was unusual for any of them to have a recording of his acquittal. And that would be funny. Before being charged in this case, the accused can be challenged before the High Court, after which any bad or conviction must be registered, ie the other accused returned to the appellant on the Federal Shariat Court memorandum. Challenge before you do
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates from Diamer lawyer
