MST. MANZOOR ELAHI versus MUHAMMAD NAWAZ
Claims 15 and 21 of the Punjab Pre-Emission Act, 1913, the Transfer of Property Act (IV of 1882), Sections 5.4 and 122 of the Registration Act (XVI of 1908), sections 17 and 49, have claimed the superior right of pre-emption in the State. In the defendants / sellers, the plaintiff, the owner of the premises Bong, claimed that the property transferred in favor of Dover by her husband was not a gift and sale that could not necessarily be re-registered while the defendant. Aliens / Shoppers claim that the change in favor of property was a change of claimant's sale and not a gift, Section Property4 Property, Property Transfer of Property One 8, 828282 of the transfer of property by oral sale by the plaintiff's husband in contravention of the provision of the contract will not give the plaintiff any rights or interest which may be the basis for the claim. There was no locus standi for the plaintiff, in the circumstances, to file a pre-discrimination claim for pre-emptive claim before the plaintiff or partner.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
ask a advocate free from Tarbela lawyer