Find a Lawyer

DIVISIONAL ENGINEER (DEV.) N-II T&T, GUJRANWALA versus RANA MUHAMMAD SHARIF

The initial notification was published two years later under section 4, 5, 5A, 6 and 17 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 of the Amendment of the Law Reform Ordinance (XII of 1972), Section 3 of the Procedure for the Acquisition of Section 3 Constitution. Was. The issuance of the notification was not issued under section 4 nor was the declaration issued under section 5 of the Act, 4 years and 3 months after the issuance of the initial notification and approximately 2 years and 2 of its publication. Months later, the appellants issued a notification under Section 17 of the Act, it was published 1/2 month thereafter, and the order to seize it was issued and the constitutional petition filed by the respondents was accepted. And the notification and order to seize it were declared illegal and without legal authority, such events, notifications and orders clearly The inexperienced, inactive and indifferent ways of acquiring powers appeared to be unconscious of the prompt and effective performance of the legal duties and were ordered by the section mandate provided in the Act's scheme. Granted, the authorities appear to be incapable of providing respondent-related rights, whose land was essentially denied. Acquisition of clauses 5 and 5 of the Act became an unreasonable commitment to compensation and objections, under which section 17 had to suffer the impression that the authorities had to provide protection to the appellant at their discretion. And the actions were not subject to period constraints. Any time of legally limited period of time means all the time increased \ Such misinterpretation will clearly make the performance of the duties of the acquisition authorities as such. immigration advocate from Sagri lawyer