Find a Lawyer

BADSHAH HASSAN versus INTERIOR MINISTRY THROUGH SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN

Government Employees (Talent and Discipline) Rules, 1973 Rr 3 (d), 4 (1) (b) (ii), 5 & 6 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3)) The negligence, negligence and indifference of public servants regarding public service, as well as the intentional retirement and discharge of duty due to unsatisfactory performance. The fact is that he never performed his duties seriously and was absent on various occasions without the knowledge of the relevant constituencies, which are all mandatory under the rules of public servants (performance and discipline). Disorganization is due to proper investigation and completion of legal customs. 1973 and, giving him a fair chance to be heard, the civil servant was treated mildly and forced to retire when the habit was absent, exchanging with the monthly pension due to lack of formal and public duties. After the payment and no injustice was done, the action taken by the competent authority was neither serious nor arbitrary, but based on reasoned, concrete and credible and credible service tribunal. Was rightfully demanding. The Supreme Court refused to grant leave of appeal and in the circumstances dismissed the application. lawer from fb area from Khushal Kot lawyer