SUBEDAR (RETIRED) MUHAMMAD KHAN versus ADALAT KHAN
Section 24 (2) of the Punjab Pre-Emission Act 1991 and 35 of the P&P Pre-Erection Ordinance (v. 1990), the dismissal of the case for non-submission of harm suit to section 36 under section 36 of the Punjab Pre-Impression Ordinance 194 1992 I was restored. In 1991, the plaintiff was ordered to deposit the amount in goldsmith within 20 days following the deduction of the fifth sum deposited by him after filing the case in 9 days 1988. Failure to submit, therefore, the trial court rejected his request for an extension. The plaintiff's request was dismissed that the date of filing of the suit cannot be filed on the date of filing of suit, which was filed on the 9th 1987, the judgment was to be decided under Section 35 of the Punjab Rehabilitation Case. Act, 1991 = In the judgment of expression used in section 35, this process shall include all proceedings and proceedings, including the submission of the trial court to the court under the Act. Failure to deposit the balance of the gold by the defendant suit for the balance of days to be deposited in the balance was dismissed under Section 24 (2) of the Oh Act and at the same time The extension request was rejected.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
