Find a Lawyer

NAWAB ALIAS BABU versus MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE

For the specific performance of the contract, the Section 12 suit claimed that the defendant had agreed to sell the residential house for Rs 4000 as per the sale agreement and had paid some amount in advance and pending consideration. The defendants had to pay at the time, resisting the enforcement of the sale deadline suit, alleging that the sale agreement was a breach and that they had never followed the deal that was allegedly signed, There was a receipt from his contents that was allegedly paid in advance. Documents on the contracts for the sale of the house were written in different inks and the executioner's thumbprints and minor witnesses' signatures were also in different inks, two lines were included in the document. Possibly, it cannot be denied. Minor testimony to prove the agreement, but since the document itself was not beyond suspension, it could not be for the benefit of the equivalent performance relief from the specific performance, the plaintiff did not get the right to the residential house only Rs. The conclusion drawn by the appellate court for the same was deemed unpredictable and was based on the assumption that the appellate court's decision was bad in law. The High Court had set aside the second appeal us immigration advocates from Deh Pathaan lawyer