MUHAMMAD ISLAM KHAN versus MUHAMMAD ANWAR KHAN
Articles 117 and 119 of the Special Relief Act (of 1877), the specific performance of the Section 12 agreement, the final result of the fact by the courts below the burden of proof - the defendant's absence in the testimony, both the courts below Together, the dispute was not dealt with by the defendant. The lawsuit and appeal were therefore dismissed. The plaintiff's argument was that when the defendant did not appear in the witness box, the decisions and orders passed by the courts below were unlawful and contrary to the facts where the burden of proof was initially on the plaintiff. And he failed to conclude the same case, the defendant's non-submission was not material and the conclusions obtained by the harmony of the two courts did not face any misreading or non-reading of the evidence from which the amended jurisdiction. Interference can be guaranteed.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firm from Ali Chak lawyer