BASHIR AHMAD versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER/DEPUTY SETTLEMENTCOMMISSIONER, SHAKARGA
Article 3 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution of the Evacuation and Displaced Persons Act (Cancellation) Act, 1975, proposed the allotment of land in favor of the respondent in the constitutional dispute and the High Court. The notification officer had previously been instructed to confirm some facts. If any applicant claimed that they had been in occupation of the dispute in the area of the population since 1946 and never proposed for allotment for the foregoing in the interest of the defendants, the applicants kept some place. Was. Not only was the material on record in support of his claim, but the notified officer not only confirmed the facts mentioned, but also approved the negative order without giving notice to the applicants and the notification officer was implemented under the direction of the High Court. And it must be verified. The facts, which he failed to make in the allotment of land made in favor of the respondents, could not be reversed by the notified officer's agreement regarding the correct and correct compliance of the directions of the High Court case. Accordingly, the notification officer was sent to make a decision again in compliance with the directions of the High Court after hearing by the parties.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
