A VII, R 11 The plaintiff's rejection of the plaintiff scope issued a letter of appointment to the plaintiff and a suit to issue a directive to accommodate him, the trial court asked the defendants to file written statements and responses. But the due date for the written statement was dismissed after the prosecution maintained the court's inadmissible order that the prosecution's court was of the view that the trial court erred in dismissing the case. Worked as if the court, without asking for a written statement, preparing the case and recording the evidence, A dog. Do not summarize the case The plaintiff relied on certain documents in support of her claim that indicated her success in some degree necessary for the appointment against this post, and thus without further contradiction, 'S claim could not be placed on Dist Bin. As concrete justice demanded that their claim should be considered in the light of the evidence brought by the defendant, his claim was to be settled legally but not done, O VII, R 11 be resorted to. Yes, there will be an abortion of the CPC justice on which the review application was granted and the case has been referred to the trial court for further decision.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2013
