Find a Lawyer

SHEHZAD ALIAS SHADDA versus THE STATE

Definition of section 10 (3) / 11 evidence was delayed by three days in filing FIR, especially when the complainant was given reason in the FIR to intervene in the handling of the case. Because of this his family needed some time to make a decision. After scrutinizing the woman and the ill-fated female doctor accompanying the survivors to wounds and wounds, the man found three gunshot wounds on his man, which showed that he was dragged to violence. And his injuries were a manifestation of his resistance. When the police filed an FIR, the police targeted the affected lady doctor, who examined her and a video report from the Chemical Examiner stated that the victim had been sexually assaulted because in clear and specific terms, Sabas Was stained with semen. He was forcibly removed from his home and taken to a nearby home where the suspects, along with an unidentified man, committed adultery, forced the victim of the revenge dispute to inspect the girl instead of inspecting her with the chief. As more accusations were made, not a single question was raised that it was disputing false allegations or rivalries between the parties, it was merely the imagination of the accused. The same could not be proved with any evidence. Repeated allegations against the accused led to the prosecution's trial arguing that the victim was likely to be a voluntary party, which could not be accepted as a 16/17 year. Age was forcibly lifted and the injury itself list of advocates from Rahimyar Khan lawyer