Find a Lawyer

IFTIKHAR ALIAS CHHIKI versus THE STATE

Section 2302 / evidence 34 Definition of evidence was not proved by the prosecution, FIR was also dismissed which stated that the accused were equipped with a pistol at the time of the incident, but complained during the investigation. Other eyewitnesses presented by the defendant and the prosecution maintain that in fact, the accused were equipped with rifles during the incident, even the rifles allegedly recovered from the accused during the investigation were not linked to the alleged crime. Since no crime was recovered from the scene of the incident, any crime was allegedly vacated. The question of whether the defendant was not produced was not proved by any independent evidence relating to the accused who was recovered from the incident. Shoes from the collection of the rifles and the location of the accused were not provided in the ocular account. Independent correction was not performed. Medical evidence not indicated by the prosecution The FIR of the accused was registered by the complainant instead of the incident when the police arrived at the scene after receiving information from an unknown source, FIR at the time of the incident. The registration will give rise to the fact that an FIR was filed after the investigation. During the night and at the relevant time the light source was far from set up, there was a light bulb at the time of the incident, but no such bulb was recovered during the investigation of the case when the victim's wife. Despite the father and a brother of the deceased being present, the complainant was available at the relevant time, who was presented as an eyewitness, the male victim and the victim's relatives. jobs for fresh advocates from Sherani lawyer