Find a Lawyer

KHADIM HUSSAIN versus MUHAMMAD NAWAZ

The dismissal of the limitation Act 1908 section 5 and Article 152 delayed the appeal against the defendant and the trial court's order was upheld by the appellate court when it was barred by the defendant from raising the plea. That he knew about the decision. When he was arrested by the trial court as a result of the execution petition filed against him, the record shows that the defendant was present during the trial and that he only happened when he made him countless occasions. Nevertheless, he failed to produce any evidence when he was sentenced to trial. And the order passed by the trial court on 24 April 1998 was suspended by the defendant after the expiry of two years and the reasonableness delay of each should be explained while the time restriction. Delays in filing an appeal or review could have been sought because that could be the case. As the defendant failed to convince the court how he was disobedient to the trial court's ruling and order, the court refused to interfere with the wrong decisions and the order was dismissed. top advocate from Shankiari lawyer