SARDAR KHAN versus MANAGING DIRECTOR (POWER), WAPDA
Constitution Pakistan 1973 Article 212 (3) Detection of Service Termination The employee of the Supreme Court-bound government was found guilty of fraud by interference from the service tribunal and was dismissed as a result of a departmental inquiry as well as a service tribunal. The appeal brought before the employee was dismissed because the co-accused was reinstated from the job, therefore, he was also entitled to reinstatement by the associate tribunal's service tribunal, against which The department took action against them on the same charge. There would be no reasonable basis for a civil servant to do the same and the further inquiry officer found the public employee involved in the fraud and was convicted and the service tribunal, without exception, appealed his appeal properly. Was rejected and neither can its findings be presented to the Supreme Court by the Service Tribunal for the assessment of the evidence, nor was there any question about a law of public importance that sought intervention. The appeal for the appeal was denied by the Supreme Court
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
