Find a Lawyer

GOVERNMENT OF ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN versus MUHAMMAD YASEEN

Rules of Rule 3 (a), 4 & 5 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 1212 (3) of Government Employees (Efficiency and Discipline) Regulations, negligence and negligence of Government property. The damage was not done by public servants. Complying with the instructions on cash transport and sending Rs 503,500 in cash to the bank instead of the vehicle and armed escort, the subordinates were stopped by unknown suspects who were taken away by the government employee while going to the bank. Cash at gunpoint was required to be transported in a public vehicle and in the event of non-availability of a public vehicle, the regional director / officer in charge was to arrange alternatives to the satisfaction of the authorities but failed to show that the availability of an armed escort. Despite the government vehicle, the public servant allowed his subordinates to take cash in the bank on foot, in violation of the government's instructions, because disclosure by a government employee in charge of a sewing center. Due to the inadequacy of proper security arrangements, move from place to place The money was transferred. Under the instructions, the authorities sentenced a government employee to a rank. , The service tribunal allowed the appeal and the sentence was changed to prevent two increments, the department was also guilty of negligence of the employee of the public servant, which damaged the government's discretion and punished the service tribunal. Gone. Supreme Court refuses to interfere in service court's decision passed by tribunal divorce advocates from Talhur lawyer