Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SIDDIQ versus FATIMA BIBI

Amendment of the limitation of retaining the suit for the declaration of its share in the suit land and the determination that it does not get rid of the possession by the Special Relief Act 1877 Section 42 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 115 Partnership The jurisdiction, the exercise of the suit was ordered and the plaintiffs' share suit land was specified although there was nothing wrong with the determination of the shares in the suit land, but without holding that the nominee was acquitted. Was not sustained and the appellate court was banned at the time which the appellate court could not explain how the issue was dealt with. The trial is underway. Plaintiffs who were Muslim at the time and were not obligated to take possession of the shareholders in the suit area because having a partner share would benefit all the owners who the appellate court granted to the plaintiffs / applicants Worked without legal authority for judgment and decree cancellation. Was set aside and restored by the High Court in the review process which was approved by the trial court. famous high court advocate from Sudhnoti lawyer