Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AKBAR versus THE STATE

Pakistan Penal Code Section 302/324/436/452/148/149 Suppression of Terrorist Activities (Special Courts) Act (XV of 1975), testimony of the injured prosecution of section 4 and testimony of evidence, ending in its place As evidenced by his presence. The incident clearly supported the complainant's version of the injuries sustained on the victim as well as on his own person, and oral evidence is further corroborated by medical evidence, which is described by the medical officer's statement. Was on the record. It was admitted that the death of the victim is the result of injury attributed to the oral evidence of the accused and the witnesses, read with medical evidence, in the circumstances, it was beyond any doubt that the victim's death was the cause of the injuries. Is from The suspected co-accused was injured in the leg of the deceased, which was proved by oral and documentary evidence, but said that the injuries to the injured arm resulted in the death of other witnesses of the injured prosecutor. It was also proved that the accused had challenged the jurisdiction of the trial court on the ground that under section 6436, one of the offenses, PPC fell. In the jurisdiction of the courts established under the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1975, the trial court was not entitled to any jurisdiction in the matter as the Central Crime was under section 302, PPC and not Section 436, pp. Under C and he said that no objection was ever raised by the accused. Before the trial court it was alleged that he was fully responsible for the brutal death of an 18-year-old boy, and immigration advocate from Pindi gheb lawyer