The defendant was charged with good faith in the conduct of section 9 (c) drug possession, with direct possession of the Probate Grant accused, and the report of the Franzic Science Laboratory was a positive possession officer, and the author of the sender wrote his version. Was reiterated. Through it, in his Marisella report, the minor witness of the recovery memo confirmed the version of the seasoning officer and testified that the memo had taken his signature and made a presence on the spot and the recovery memo. The slightest testimony of was based on every substance. Specifically, the incident was provided but nothing could be extracted which could have been helpful to the defense. No evil, unlawful desire or enmity was attributed to the prosecution's witnesses. The fact is, the prosecution's witnesses were not enough police officers. Impressive and credible testimony of their trust to the police The witnesses, like others, were good witnesses, and their testimony could be relied on as long as they had any ill will from the accused. There was nothing on record to prove the defendant's previous intervention or conviction in such cases. As a first offender, he was released on bail at the age of 49/50 at current bail and was sentenced to 3 years rigorous imprisonment for good conduct, for the duration of his sentence. was done.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2013
