Find a Lawyer

GHULAM YASIN versus THE STATE

Section 2 evidence2 The definition of evidence was not open to any suspicion as the incident occurred in the event of a daily death and was reported in detail to the police without harm. Which was fully supported by the medical. The evidence compiled by the prosecution was sufficiently convincing, and it is likely that the defendant fired shots at his first cousin after chasing him without showing any mercy and sympathy. Had worked brutally while driving. Speaking terms with the deceased could not be justified in promoting the crime, which was not used by his predecessor, nor was the court required to allow the crime to escalate. And the court had to ensure full justice according to justice. The principle of equality and good conscience was asked to compromise, which was not valid or acceptable, and it was rejected and even if convicted, the death sentence of the accused was confirmed. criminal advocate from Larkana lawyer