Find a Lawyer

SYED FARASAT ALI SHAH versus ALLIED BANK OF PAKISTAN LIMITED

Banking Tribunals Ordinance 1984 Section 9 Financial Institutions (Finance) Ordinance (XLVI of 2001), Section 5 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application The orders passed against the applicants by the banking tribunal were not merged in the appeals. , But they were detained in constitutional petitions. Following the expiry of the deadline for filing the appeal, the High Court disposed of the constitutional petitions because of the judgment filed in the case against Chenab Cement Products (Private) Limited and other bank tribunals, Lahore. The execution proceedings began, on which the applicants objected that in view of the Chenab Cement Product (SUPRA), such orders would be considered as submitted, therefore, the banking tribunal dismissed the petition, which Such decrees were and are protected. Previous and closed cases were considered and in Chaudhry's case the final decision was taken because there was no legal barrier to implementing and implementing the cement product (supra) where the order passed by the banking tribunal. Was challenged by filing an appeal as well as by filing a constitutional petition, and the latter was dealt with following the matter. Chenab Cement Product (SUPRA), then in that case, this decision will not be included in the scope of this decision and it will not be brought in a past and closed case, but it will be considered that the High Court rejected the Constitution. The applications are in force, resulting in the orders passed in the applicant's cases under section 5 of the Financial Institution (Recovery of Finance) Ordinance 2001 family advocate from Barbar Loi lawyer