SAJAWAL versus THE STATE
Section 2302 (b) Definition of Evidence The benefit of the doubt was that no direct evidence was available in this case, and the prosecution's case was based only on the evidence of the circumstances, until the final witness regarding the deceased's death was silent. The statement was very clear. The suspected extra-judicial confession was not before any significant value of the testimony of the accused jointly with the other accused. Otherwise, the extra judicial confession of the accused during his detention was also not free of doubt. The motivating part of the story of the prosecution given in the FIR was not supported by the complainant at trial but the dead body recovered at the behest of the accused. Was not, nor was it owned or found lying in the state, there was no benefit to the shedding of blood and the restoration of other pernicious articles. In the absence of any further direct or circumstantial evidence against the accused, the prosecution had the prosecution left on the benefit of the doubt in the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for fresh advocates from Hub Chowki lawyer