SALIM PERVAIZ versus HUSSAIN BANO
Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance 1979 Section 15 (2) (II) (Iiv) Law on the Martyrs (10 of 1984), Article 163 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) on default premises and records in payment of rent. On the basis of the evidence, all the matters relating to rent control were found to be negative and the petition for rent filed by the applicant was dismissed. The first appeal filed against such decision was also dismissed by the High Court on the basis of which the special oath was taken. Was put on It was not accepted by the rental controller as the default case, thus, the testimony of the law, the provisions of Article 163 of 1984 were violated, no serious misrepresentation and / or No evidence of words was neglected. The High Court rightly found that the Runt Controller relied not only on the special oath, but also on the other evidence brought on record, the impeachment decision was based on the proper evaluation of the evidence on record SU. The primary court refused to grant leave for appeal
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
divorce advocates from Narowal lawyer