Find a Lawyer

KARACHI TANNERY (PVT.) LTD. versus MUHAMMAD YOUSAF

Sections 15 (2) (vii), 19 and 20 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) The personal need of the landlord refusing the rent controller regarding such a requirement to summon witnesses requested by the tenant to effect Refusal In this way, no short statement has been made as to what evidence is required to be sought for the witnesses in applying for the refusal of witnesses, so that such witnesses are summoned and If they were examined, they would have supported the tenant's case that it was not necessary to make such a brief statement in the application, that the tenant should be presented to the witnesses. There was a time when an application could be made to ask the witnesses to control the rent, but there was no reason to do so. The tenant controller claimed that the tenant could file witnesses' affidavits before that. In his presence, he was demanded money. Such claims would not have any adverse effect on the merits of the cases, as no such statement was raised in the written statement or evidence, the tenant's conviction. I was not found to have any substance, the Supreme Court refused the appeal and dismissed the request. advocates from Jampur lawyer