AZHAR-UD-DIN versus AQEEL AHMAD KHAN
Code of Conduct 1908 Section 115 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3), the jurisdiction of the amended jurisdiction was Rs. 50 lakhs, filed before the District Judge in relation to the jurisdiction of the Court. The request was modified to allow editing. Through a petition, the respondents pointed out that Rs.5 million lacks the jurisdiction of the District Judge, but the petitioners who objected to it accepted the application rather than approve it, but after 4 months interval, they Withdrew its request for a review before the High Court, which is subject to all matters. Respondent petitioner filed a review petition before the High Court following a valid and legal objection, which was rejected by a time restriction. The applicant's position was that the order denying the modification of the petition was void, and therefore, there was no restriction. Challenge the same amended jurisdiction that the trial court did not suffer such a defect in the lower court's correct order of the High Court's accuracy order, which could be challenged externally for challenge under section 115 at any time. Yes, the CPC was 90 days High Court had rightly observed against the petitioner that he himself was responsible for the misconduct. He filed his application for leave of appeal, dismissing the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
tax advocates from Muzaffargarh lawyer