Find a Lawyer

SYED YAQOOB SHAH versus XEN, PESCO (WAPDA), PESHAWAR

Implementation of Supreme Court's ROZs XV, R10 Expenses Justice Administration mistakenly dismissed Water and Power Development Authority's treatment Employees were illegally dismissed Not only because of such misconduct Employee But the authority was involved in litigation. The Supreme Court restores the employees from the job with the benefit of leaving the job at the expense of the state treasury; All government officials had a duty to expel them. Their duties are public until they show that the error was very good, and when such workers exceed their jurisdiction and violate the provisions of the law subject to legal exemption in criminal cases, Civil knowingly, cannot claim compensation for damages. If they did, then they would have to bear the burden of riding on their shoulders, including the financial burden of sharing, both personally and individually, the Supreme Court's opinion that if government officials had a hard time setting such an obligation. If banned, he would not only decide to deal with the law and act in accordance with the law, without malicious and malafide behavior, but government servants would not be subjected to torture because they would be subject to sovereign immunity. Enjoyment because such immunity cannot be extended to the officers concerned because they have The action was based on a fully coupled la. This way family advocate from Bewal lawyer