SOHAIL AHMAD SHEIKH versus SECRETARY, HOME AND TRIBAL AFFAIRS, GOVERNMENT OF BALOCHISTAN, QUETTA
Section 2 (A) and 8 Balochistan Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion and Exchange) Rules, 1979, RR 10, 18 and 19 Balochistan Public Service Commission (Duties) Rules 1987, R 5 Seniority Government Employee as D on a regular basis Section P was appointed on the recommendation of the Public Service Commission while anti-government employees were appointed on ad hoc basis. Opposing the regularization of ad hoc appointments of public servants, he appeared before the Public Service Commission on the authority's direction and took the written examination, but failed, and the Commission proposed withdrawal. Anti-government employees' appointment orders, but the authority regularized their services despite the fact that public servants had neither filed nor filed an appeal in this regard, Before, the names of public servants were higher than the names of public servants. , Which list had been finalized, but later on in the seniority list, which was regularly issued after the dissolution of public servants, public servants were named after government employees who were named government employees. From senior to show. Despite the failure of the written test, public servants were opposed and their services were regularized with disappointment. The authority of such conduct authorities was highly questionable and the misconduct of this authority was unfortunate, however, In any case, any rule has the power to soften or change its policy or regulate ad hoc appointment with prejudice, but the use of such power
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous lower court advocate from Tobatek Singh lawyer