Find a Lawyer

MIR ABDUL RAZZAQ JAMALDINI versus GOVERNMENT OF BALOCHISTAN

Sections 3 (2) and 4 (b) (i) of the Balochistan Service Tribunals Act, 1974 (Appointment, Promotion and Exchange) Rules, 1979, R7 Development of high grade or service tribunal Appellant / Government employee appeal After the jurisdiction, which was promoted to B-19, it represented progress three times in B-20, but the Provincial Selection Board dismissed their case on the basis of unsatisfactory service record, which was interpreted as a negative comment. And his junior was dismissed from development, the government employee filed an appeal before the service tribunal ruled out any government against his high performance. The issue of promotion to the highest rank of the employee was not covered by the service tribunal, otherwise the promotion of higher grade or rank was not the right of any public servant as it was not included. The matters relating to the terms and conditions of posts B 19 and above were selection posts, which no officer could claim to have constituted a provincial election. The board, which dealt with the development of a civil servant, was not challenged to be illegal and the department had followed the board's recommendations in the absence of any bead by the board and the departmental authority. ? The matter was rightly dismissed in the absence of jurisdiction of the service tribunal; the appeal filed by a public servant was dismissed for invalidity of jurisdiction. attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Ziarat lawyer