The Section 42 dispute between the parties was in reference to the vacant plot under which the suit filed by the plaintiff was dismissed by the trial court, but the lower appellate court ruled in its favor that the defendants had submitted. That the lawsuit was timely barred by the plaintiff in respect of a property that was a vacant plot and that the title established by the plaintiff was, therefore, under the law, he was an entitled As an owner, it was thought that the vacancy was occupied. Except for the mere possession of the rightful owner, nothing was in favor of the defendants, but those allowed by the government had no black and nothing to establish the title of the government, which the Lower Appellate. The court had arrived in which it demanded the High Court not to interfere. The revision of the circumstances under which your modification jurisdiction was denied was denied
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2013
