Find a Lawyer

ABDUL GHAFOOR versus THE STATE

Pakistan Penal Code Section 302/394/34 The West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), the names of the accused who have been exposed during the 13th night, were not disclosed in the FIR. The prosecution's witnesses could not be suspected at the time of the incident, and another prosecutor's witness was present at the time of the complaint, but they were not injured. During their cross-examination, the prosecution's witnesses could not be dispersed. The suspect was near the injured witnesses, who identified them with torchlight as well as ocular evidence and identification t Sta was backed by a ballistic expert with weapons recovered. It was positive that separate cases were registered against the accused under Section 13 of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance, 1965. The accused did not injure the deceased, while the third suspect was all at night the flashlight in the light of the identification of a person can get the wrong impression, treating such incidents, the death sentence of the accused without any. The sentence was reduced to life imprisonment without lowering the standard or the standard of proof maintained and the punishment of the remaining offenders was maintained lawer from fb area from Jhudo lawyer