MUZAFFAR HUSSAIN versus PROVINCE OF SINDH
Article 204 In exercise of the jurisdiction of the Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Article 204 by the High Court, Article 204 Truncate of Court Act (LXIV of 1976), directions of sections 3 and 4 contempt of court, declared that the provisions of the Constitution were illegal. Is responsible for The applicant was that the candidates did not comply with the directive passed by the High Court Approval Order passed by the High Court but did not invalidate the provisions of the law and the Central Respondent of the province of Sindh through Secretary Irrigation responded in practice. That was the advice. And Power to act accordingly to abrogate the said section, where the alleged claimants had no role to perform and were allowed to reduce their own interpretation to comply with the order passed by the High Court. Were not, there was no infringement offered by them. Charges for contempt of court proceedings dismissed in contempt of court
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of supreme court advocates from FR Bannu / Lakki lawyer