Find a Lawyer

SYED MURAD ALI SHAH versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH

Determination of the Sindh Inquiries and Anti-Corruption Act 1991 and Section 3 Sindh Inquiries and Anti-Corruption Rules, RR 8 and 11 Corruption Prevention Act (IL of 1947), Section 5 Conventions (XLV of 1860), Section 161 Criminal Code V9 1898) Sections 154 and 156 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), 1993 constitute criminal jurisdiction of corrupt inquiry by public servants and establishment of anti-corruption corruption against applicants / public servants in the local police station. Accused of committing and corruption, etc., which caused massive damage to the state exchequer which can only be verified The Anti-Corruption Establishment of the Nodh Government was empowered under Section 3 of the Sindh Inquiries and Anti-Corruption Act, 1991 to inquire into any allegations of corruption against a civil servant and to initiate proceedings. For his prosecution, the FI was subject to a fundamental legal flaw in the question: they were without jurisdiction because the anti-corruption police station was available in Karachi. That is, under R11 (2) of the Rules no authorized permission was granted for any legal action against them. And that no action was taken under Section 3 of the Sindh Inquiries and Anti-Corruption Act, 1991, it was stated that after the previous approval of the Government / Anti-Corruption Committee for investigation of FI rupees, the case did not help. As in R11 (2)), prior permission was required before the High Court to register all such FIs without any jurisdiction. advocate from Dhatmal lawyer