Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD KKAN versus ANWAR BA-IG, EX-ADVOCATE MINGORA, SWAT

Legal Practitioner and Bar Councils Act 1973 Section 41 Professional misconduct The previous order, aside from delay, was condoned by the Disciplinary Committee and to record the evidence of the advocate and to finalize the case, keeping the material on record. Submitted to the Tribunal. The adjudicator failed to appear before the tribunal under his previous injunction, even from the date of the tribunal hearing from his previous injunction, the lawyer found professional misconduct, removed him immediately from the heavy-selling profession. Gave. The Advocate's request for a pre-order order was dismissed because there was a time restriction and no explanation or reason was given for the non-presentation, the Advocate knew full well that the Tribunal had acted against them. Was dealt with for a valid reason. Judging by the merits, the documentary evidence on the irrevocable record Once it has been proved that the Advocate knew of the action against him, the service will then lose its value, or otherwise, its value. Apart from this, no restrictions were also imposed. Accordingly, the application was dismissed famous supreme court advocate from Lakki Marwat lawyer