AURANGZEB, SUB-DIVISIONAL EDUCATION OFFICER, SWABI versus ISTIKHAR ALI
Legal Practitioners and Bar Councils Act 1973 Section 41 Bar Council Tribunal scope was claimed to be a school teacher at the discretionary jurisdiction of the respondents and was engaged in legal practice. Confessed that although it was the law. Upon graduation he was neither admitted nor advocated for legal practice and the jurisdiction of the Bar Council Tribunal was granted by the legal practitioners and the Secretary 41 of the Bar Council Act 1973. And then the rules were enacted. Under this, the Tribunal may take action under Section 41 of the Legal Practitioners and Bar Councils Act. In 1973, against the person who registered as an Elite Advocate, where the respondent did not appear on any of the Council's roles, the Tribunal had no jurisdiction to file a complaint regarding this allegation. It was not authorized that the defendant lead, having received his salary from the Department of Education, returned. To the applicant in the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
