JAVED BASHIR SULEHRIA, SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER versus SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB
Punjab Government Employees (Talent & Discipline) Rules 1975 8 ((1) (a) An annual increment was charged with the holding of a public servant and imposed a penalty of one year increment without effect in the future. The officer, who was assigned to the sub-divisional, was charged with building defects in a hospital and was responsible for poor care in the hospital. And the inquiry officer clearly stated in his report that public servants were not responsible for these defects, but authorized The officer did not agree with the inquiry, the officer's views, and the evidence on the record, without any valid basis, imposed a fine on the public servant, proved that the high officials had worked to construct the defects and not to repair / restore them. Although a civil servant was not found to be responsible for the defects, he cannot be fully forgiven. ?In the emergency department, it was his responsibility to maintain the supply of water when serious patients were admitted on an emergency basis and Where water was an essential thing in which a government employee failed to retain an employee, a bit The penalty for stopping the surge was set aside and replaced. With the punishment of sensation over his negligence
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
