ZAFAR RAJPOOT versus S.D.M.
National Accountability Bureau Ordinance 1999 Section 32 [as amended by the National Accountability Bureau (Amendment) Ordinance (XXV of 2001]] The revision care trial court sent the accused / applicant to a civil hospital for trial, as the trial court did The order was challenged by the accused. The request for review was resisted on the basis that the revision power was expressly stripped by the National Accountability Bureau (Amendment) Ordinance 2001, the review was not enforceable and the applicant sought further orders Can approach the trial court for. The amendment ordinance was not completely removed, but was given in appropriate cases and the accused / applicant had no opportunity to file a review and could refer to the trial court for further relief.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocate from Mangowal lawyer
