Find a Lawyer

DEPUTY COLLECTOR, CENTRAL EXCISE LANDHI DIVISION, KARACHI versus MESSRS RAJI AVIATION (PVT.) LTD. THROUGH CHIEF EXECUTIVE, RAJI HANGAR

Sections 3, 4, 11 and 35 of the Central Excise and Salt Act 1944 Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Request Central Excise Duty Non-payment of non-payment of respondents who were in the aviation business and traveling by air. Failure to provide services to the respondent after issuing a Central Excise Duty Assessment Notice on the sale of the ticket authority to the respondent for allegedly writing a letter to the Assistant Collector by fake means. Non-payment of duty is required to pay assessed duty and penalty. The defendant was discharged and at the end of the minor installments examined the duty could be paid and payment could be postponed. The Assistant Collector was completely denied, the alleged letter and a written complaint was filed with the FIA. Because of this, the appellate tribunal's order in the CH Constitution application authorizing the payment of the money alleges that the order was illegal, unlawful and unfair. Prior to the passing of this order, no notice was given to the Authority by the Appellate Tribunal, which made any payment under the forgery and fabrication letter which the author refused. The appellate tribunal shall not create any jurisdiction in favor of the respondent's order, without notice or hearing of the authority, which was set aside by the High Court on the basis of its constitutional jurisdiction, and after giving a proper case, The remand for a redistricting hearing was obtained by the authority for a hearing criminal advocate from Doltala lawyer