AZAD GOVERNMENT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY, MUZAFFARABAD versus RAJA MUHAMMAD BASHIR KHAN, S.D.O.,
Azad Jammu and Kashmir Civil Servants (Qualifications and Discipline) Rules 1977 4 5, 5 and 7 The latest showcases notice of dismissal of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VIII of 1974), Sections 42 and 44 were issued. Requiring public servants, who were prosecuted for some of the allegations, were asked by the Inquiry Officer to respond to the charge sheet against them within 14 days and they submitted their written response accordingly. Two Inquiry Officers were appointed one after another for inquiry against civil servants. The first inquiry officer also presented the same charge sheet to the government employees while the government employees had already filed a response to the charge sheet which the first inquiry officer Syed Inquiry officers submitted their report after the expiry of the ninth day and the authority. Dismissed civil servants from employment. From the charge sheet service on the government employee, the information based on delays after almost five years was delayed in finalizing an inquiry against civil servants against the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Civil Servants (Talent and Discipline) Rules, 1977. That the maximum number of inquiries was to be completed within ninety days, which was submitted after the expiry of about three years. Accusations against public servants without any inquiry report simply state that the allegations against the public servants were not proved before the inquiry officer, while the inquiry officer under section 7 (2) of the rules. Was required to record the evidence. First, respond to public servants for issuing validity notices against government employees
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
female advocates from Kashmore lawyer