Find a Lawyer

CHAIRMAN, AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR LOGGING AND SAW MILLS CORPORATION, MUZAFFARABAD versus ABDUL HAMEED SIDDIQUI

Article 2 (28) of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Industrial Relations Ordinance 1974 and 30 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution I Act (VIII of 1974), the petitioner's resolve: who was found guilty of misappropriation of money , Was removed from the job and ordered to receive money illegally because the land revenue arrears were seized by the petitioner through a writ petition. The applicant was supposed to be working. Alternative treatment is available before this Labor Court. And the applicants could not file the writ, when at the time the proceedings were started, he was serving as a supervisor in Grade A in BPS 13 and thus was not a workman petitioner. In the circumstances, Azad Jammu and Kashmir Industrial Relations. He was not entitled to treatment under the ordinance. All proceedings against the applicant before the Labor Court in 1974, from the deployment of the authorized officer to the approval of the unauthorized order by the Authority against the completion of the mandatory procedure written in the rules of efficiency and discipline. Was ignored, otherwise the matter could be maintained before the High Court as a result of the proceedings against the petitioner. A total disregard of the rules ask a advocate free from Swatmingora lawyer