MUJAHID HUSSAIN NAQVI versus JUSTICE (RID.) BASHARAT AHMAD SHAIKH
RJ 132, 133 and 134 (1) of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir High Court (Code of Conduct) 1984, the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VIII of 1974), sections 42 and 44 the Supreme Court granted leave to appeal for consideration Granted, if the High Court was competent or not, under the law, the applicant's writ petition should be banned for the purpose of press release or publication, without ordering the trial to be kept on camera and consequently Without arriving, there were contents of the writ petition filed by the applicant. In relation to the security of the country, friendly relations with Pakistan, public order, politeness or morality or contempt of court, defamation or incitement to a crime; And was it reasonable to refuse to provide a copy of the writ petition to the High Court as well as a copy of the interim order sought by the applicant to pay the costs?
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
