Section 516 A Control of the Narcotic Substances Act (XXV of 1997), Drugs Used in the Detention of Drugs Scope Used in Sections 32 and 74 of the Superior Vehicle Detection of Transport Police Without the Owner's Knowledge The Impact Impact The bus was taken into custody after the hashish was recovered, which was found in a box below the driver's seat. The bus was being operated by an appellant's employee. The appellant had moved the petition for trial of the bus before the trial court, but the appellant was dismissed because he had purchased the bus on lease from the bank for financial convenience. That it paid 55 of the 60 lease installments yesterday. That the bus was being used for public transport and not for transporting drugs. Because the recovery was not made from a hidden cavity, but from the bottom of the driver's seat. The driver of the bus was specifically responsible for the illegal movement. That he (the owner) was neither present on the bus nor allegedly tagged in connection with the restoration, and that the bus was parked in the police station, where the day was getting worse, Waldetti Appellant filed a large set of installments. The share was paid to the bank record. Although the vehicle was not used in the commission of the crime with the knowledge of the appellant, though under Section 74 of the Control of Narcotic Substances Act 1997, the accused was prohibited in the possession of a vehicle used in the export, importation or transportation of drugs. Has been given, or has no partner or relative or a private individual, until the end of the case but cannot be extended to a section that does not cover the owner of the vehicle that has no involvement or involvement in the crime. , Section 32 of the same law
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2013
