RAJA IQBAL RASHID MINHAS, ADVOCATE versus AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR COUNCIL
Articles 42, 44 and 50 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act 1974, the Chief Election Commissioner (Terms and Conditions) Act 1992, Section 3 [Substitution of the Chief Election Commissioner (Terms and Conditions) Act 2000] Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908) , A XXII, R 1 Right Petition filed by the respondents challenging the withdrawal of his appointment notification as Chief Election Commissioner and the appointment of any such other respondent, Denied the fact that she had tiled the request for withdrawal. As a member of the Bar Council and an official of a political party, the same appellant claimed that although he was not a party to the High Court, he was legally entitled to file an appeal in the public interest against the High Court decision. Yes, the Supreme Court granted leave. Appealing to consider whether Appellant had Lux Standi to come up with an application for leave to appeal, when he was neither a grieving person nor a party appointed by the Chief Justice Commissioner. Several provisions of the relevant Interim Constitution Act have been misinterpreted, especially when the defendant filed an application for withdrawal of his writ petition, or that a candidate for appointment as Chief Election Commissioner Should not be given to any candidate.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
