Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD, AMJAD versus THE STATE

Pakistan Penal Code Section 302/34 Definition of Evidence At the relevant time, the presence of the complainant and other eyewitnesses did not resign because all persons were residents of different places and the conclusion of the presence of the accused at the relevant time. It was The death of the deceased was also sacrificed at his hands, according to the FIR's contents, it was not stated why the casualty was caused by the fire, nor was the number of fire shots. On the complainant's statement that the two suspects were armed with firearms, the doctor's statement was denied, saying that the injury to the deceased person was due to a sharp weapon. The allegedly used pistol, in fact, was recovered 8 days after the recovery of the vacancies, but the vacant site was not sent to the forensic science laboratory until PK was recovered. There was no explanation for the stool and that it was said that I could be married to a pistol late for sending vacancies, which was recovered 8 days after the vacancy was vacated, the allegedly safe knife was not rejected. What could have been, was not revealed to be a blood stain. But the Chemical Examiner's report revealed that the blood was stained. The parcel said the theft was not ready on the spot, but the prosecution had succeeded in obtaining the Chemical Examiner's report and was told that the fact was a knife. At the same time, the Chemical Examiner's report was unreliable as well. The prosecution was denied because the prosecution proved its case against the accused beyond reasonable doubt advocates from Wana lawyer