Find a Lawyer

ZAFAR IQBAL versus THE STATE

The evidence of the accused was not named in the section 302/392/34 FIR and it was an unexpected incident which was based on circumstantial evidence and even the body of the victim was not recovered. The middle was evident. Extra judicial confession and medical evidence Extra judicial confession The conduct of witnesses was unnatural as they neither arrested the accused nor presented to the police the statements of the witnesses regarding the confession of the accused. Recorded. After the alleged confession of the accused's extra-judicial confession, which otherwise contradicted the medical evidence, the evidence was admissible and could not be ascertained that he did not see the witness before he appeared in the company of the accused. Cannot be stated as. The recoveries were of no importance because no report of a firearms expert was in the record prosecution, the accused failed to prove his case and the suspect was able to create suspicion and suspicion in the prosecution's story, to the benefit of the doubt. The accused had to be escalated, in which case the trial sentenced the accused and sentenced him. One side and the suspects were ordered to be released soon immigration advocates from Chak Sawara lawyer