Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SAEED MEHDI versus THE STATE

The National Accountability Bureau Ordinance 1999 was a trial under section 9 (a) (iii) (vi) Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), section 497/498 Pakistan's Lonstruction (1973), Article 199 constitutional bail plea. ? (iii) (vi) The Minister's House question is for allegations of misappropriation of his authority as a public artist in the approval of the funds of the National Accountability Bureau Ordinance 1999 and the construction of a polo ground in the premises of the Prime Minister. That the charge against the alleged misappropriation of powers in the payment of his official duties was not sustained on the basis of the evidence collected by the prosecution, which cannot be answered without a detailed examination of the evidence. Are. The defendant's defense request relates that he did not commit any crime by excluding the official ceremony as per the rules, but on the basis of which the prosecution's action clearly suggested that it was a reasonable basis. To believe that the accused had committed an unlawful crime or that he was not a victim of Mola Freud's defect or arrested for detention and detention under the National Accountability Bureau Ordinance, 1999, or That there was no evidence available to prosecute the accused under the said ordinance case against the accused, therefore, Haikou Tee did not qualify for interference and his acceptance of bail under Article 199 of the Constitution, however, imprisoned he was entitled to the disease he was required to suffer. Treatment should be provided and the jail superintendent was instructed to do so in the light of doctors' opinions. Pakistan, top advocate family court from Noorpur nooranga lawyer