Find a Lawyer

AHMAD BAKHSH versus NASIR KHAN

The applicants for the pre-discrimination case of section 24 of the Punjab Pre-Emission Act, 1991, had deposited the amount of hassle a day before the expiry of 30 days. The trial court dismissed the plaintiff, the appellate court dismissed the appeal filed under the petitioner; Section 24, Punjab Pre-Impression Act, 1991, being compulsory in nature, resulted in non-compliance. 3 The plaintiff will be dismissed for premature deposit, unless extended or extended by the court, nor has the court been given any authority for extension. Prior to filing the case, the same applicant knew that within 30 days from the date of filing of the case, he would have to submit 3% of the time, which he should have prepared. 1 Petitioner failed to submit the petition. Violated the mandatory provision of the law. / 3 money The pre-discrimination amount, which is within the stipulated time period by the law itself, therefore, suffered the consequences - the last day the amount of the deposit, if not compromised, was certainly ind Was controversial v. He was not vigilant and had to suffer the consequences, being in accordance with both decisions and orders / law, the intervention of the High Court was not sought in the amended jurisdiction. Dismissed in circumstances immigration advocates email from Pindi gheb lawyer