Authorities conducting a raid on the Investigating Office of the Unauthorized Transaction Proofs in Articles 23 and 23A of the Foreign Exchange and the alleged businessman of the Sessions Judge arrested the accused, the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947 Was convicted under Section 23 of the IPC. Some of the accused's convictions were recovered at that time. His arrest was not an unusual incident as he was working as a manager of a Madison company in the office where the raid took place. The currency found in the possession of the accused was a Pakistani currency, not a foreign currency. That no documents were recovered from the accused who could link him to the business of handiwork. That the session judge was not eligible for any review in this case, and that the complaint against the accused was not made by a competent person. The Madison Company had an office where the drug trade was done and no foreign currency was recovered from the accused. Syed's witness also sent some fax messages and according to the names of the persons who visited the accused's office. Received their sums but said fax messages were not brought on the record Keeping some money by someone, doing pharmaceutical business, without any supporting document, will not show your involvement in the handiwork business. Action was not taken accordingly. A tribunal required under Sections 23 and 23A of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947, therefore, proceed unless an individual has been complained in writing by the Federal Government or the State Bank for an offense that is an illegal Judicial Tribunal. Couldn't admit but
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2013
