GUL KHAN versus S.H.O. POLICE STATION ANTI-NARCOTICS FORCE, PESHAWAR
Sections 9 (c), 46 and 48 of the Anti Narcotics Force Act (III of 1997) Section 5 Constitution of Pakistan, Arts 10A, 247 and 199 Notification Section R1212 (I) / 98, dated 16 11 1998 Notice Section R489 ( I)) 98/4/98 Constitutional Request for ANF, Dated 6 12 2010 Fair Trial, Right to Anti-Drug Force Functions Controlling Narcotic Material Stances on the Federally Administered Tribal Area (FATA) Applicant Was arrested under the Act of 1997. The FATA petitioner sought to quash the proceedings on the basis that neither the Control of Narcotic Substance Act 1997 nor the Anti-Narcotics Force Act 1997 were applied in connection with FATA's affidavit. The Anti-Narcotics Force Act, 1997 and the Control of Narcotic Materials Act 1997 were enacted and made effective / effective in both laws; raids were conducted by two Khyber Agency Tehsil Anti-Narcotics Force Police Station Anti-Narcotics Force, Peshawar. Authorization, all measures, investigations, investigations, drug confiscation, recovery of the same victims was legal and could not be terminated or no application was allowed thereafter. Had obtained jurisdiction over the political agent and reinforcements to the FATA were enforced under the Anti-Narcotics Force Act, 1997 and the Drug Enforcement Control Act, 1997 under the Feltier Crimes Regulations 1901, in such cases as mandatory conditions. And the option was to continue. The High Court was not extended to FATA in view of Article 247 (7) of the Constitution. The High Court recommended that such legal irregularities, which could cause considerable confusion, need to be clarified and
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2013
